WHY ECONOMIC POLICY MUST DEPEND ON DATA MORE THAN THEORY

Why economic policy must depend on data more than theory

Why economic policy must depend on data more than theory

Blog Article

This informative article investigates the old theory of diminishing returns and the importance of data to economic theory.



During the 1980s, high rates of returns on government debt made many investors think that these assets are highly lucrative. However, long-term historical data indicate that during normal economic conditions, the returns on federal government debt are lower than most people would think. There are several factors that can help us understand this phenomenon. Economic cycles, monetary crises, and financial and monetary policy modifications can all influence the returns on these financial instruments. Nonetheless, economists are finding that the actual return on securities and short-term bills often is fairly low. Although some investors cheered at the recent interest rate rises, it is not normally reasons to leap into buying because a reversal to more typical conditions; therefore, low returns are unavoidable.

A famous 18th-century economist once argued that as investors such as Ras Al Khaimah based Farhad Azima accumulated capital, their assets would suffer diminishing returns and their payback would drop to zero. This notion no longer holds in our global economy. Whenever taking a look at the undeniable fact that stocks of assets have doubled as a share of Gross Domestic Product since the 1970s, it appears that in contrast to dealing with diminishing returns, investors such as for instance Haider Ali Khan in Ras Al Khaimah continue progressively to reap significant profits from these assets. The reason is easy: unlike the firms of the economist's time, today's companies are increasingly replacing devices for human labour, which has doubled effectiveness and output.

Although data gathering is seen as being a tiresome task, it really is undeniably crucial for economic research. Economic theories tend to be based on assumptions that prove to be false as soon as useful data is gathered. Take, for example, rates of returns on investments; a small grouping of researchers examined rates of returns of crucial asset classes across 16 advanced economies for a period of 135 years. The extensive data set represents the first of its type in terms of extent in terms of time period and number of countries. For each of the 16 economies, they craft a long-term series revealing annual real rates of return factoring in investment income, such as dividends, capital gains, all net inflation for government bonds and short-term bills, equities and housing. The authors uncovered some new fundamental economic facts and challenged other taken for granted concepts. Maybe such as, they've found housing offers a superior return than equities in the long haul although the typical yield is fairly comparable, but equity returns are a great deal more volatile. But, this does not affect property owners; the calculation is founded on long-run return on housing, taking into consideration leasing yields because it makes up about half the long-run return on housing. Needless to say, having a diversified portfolio of rent-yielding properties just isn't the exact same as borrowing to purchase a family home as would investors such as Benoy Kurien in Ras Al Khaimah most likely attest.

Report this page